With a change of Prime minister in the UK, there comes with it a very big shake up of the technology aspect of government. The closure of the Department of Science and Technology (DSIT) with many of its responsibilities being sent to the business department or the cabinet office. One of the big surprises is the move of the Government digital service (GDS) into the renamed Department of Digital, Culture, Media and sport (DCMS). This comes only a couple of years after GDS was moved out of the Cabinet office where it was founded and had a cross government role, to be relaunched as part of DSIT. The Machinery of Government changes fact sheet details that GDS moving into DCMS is so that it can continue the program of modernising government services, whilst referring the the split of DSIT as wanting to embed technology into all parts of government. Other highlights are AI policy moving to the cabinet office and the new office for the Prime minister, and the new minister for AI.
Some aspects seem to have come out of wanting to not seen as a separate line item that runs on it’s own. There also seems to be a realignment of technology policy in government that is in contrast to the previous Starmer administration. It’s notable that one of the key polices on the first day of Andy Burnhams premiership was to cancel the Digital ID scheme, to fund a VAT cut in electricity. But I think this also represents a shifting attitude to tech in government, less focus of big bang digital programmes and more emphasis on helping people right now with programmes that have a direct benefit.
The move of GDS to the culture department though has caused a lot of confusion, with many of those who work in or around the digital government sector commenting on it being a strange move, that a service that drives it further away from it’s position of influencing change across all of government.
You’re not serious about devolution if GOV.UK One Login isn’t politically backed to prioritise local authorities and MSAs over Whitehall. DCMS doesn’t have and never will have that political capital. Devolution requires Whitehall to provide local government and MSAs with the digital plumbing underpinning all modern public services, a gargantuan cultural shift needing genuine servant leadership from the centre.
Tom Loosemore — Deckchair shuffling is for the unserious
He goes on to point out the there are a range of significant services, Gov Notify and Gov Pay amongst them, that have become common platforms across government and in local councils. These services simplify implementation and address common needs (sending mobile notifications and emails and handling payments) without having to procure a separate supplier at additional cost. He asks the question that is a policy department really able to deliver the heft needed for building government tech foundations?
I also wonder what will happen to newly born GDS programmes. Customer first is trying to find new user centred approaches to joined up government services, and GDS Local which was about enhancing collaboration between central and local government in technology, and try to help with some of the knotty problems like procurement at a local level. In some way, I’m surprised GDS didn’t make it into the new Number 10 north, acting as a driver for digital and tech within government, but also pushing that out to the regions and to local authorities so that all levels can benefit from GDS work equally, and even some of the work done at a local level in front line digital teams can push up and be used at a national level.
We will have to watch as the situation unfolds, I’m hopeful that this is more about allowing technology policy and services to become much more embedded into all aspects and levels of what the government does, and hope that this is not GDS being sent to the outer reaches to be forgotten about.
Featured image — GDS Logo — Crystal ball Photo by Monique Pongan on Unsplash